Current:Home > ScamsTokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages -Ascend Wealth Education
Tokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages
View
Date:2025-04-17 21:56:05
TOKYO (AP) — A Tokyo court on Tuesday held only the operator of the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant responsible for paying damages to dozens of evacuees.
The Tokyo High Court also slashed the amount to half of what the lower court had ordered and relieved the government of responsibility — a decision that plaintiffs and their lawyers criticized as belittling their suffering and the severity of the disaster.
The court ordered only the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, known as TEPCO, to pay a total of 23.5 million yen ($165,000) to 44 of the 47 plaintiffs, while not holding the government accountable.
Tuesday’s ruling apparently backpedaled from an earlier decision in March 2018, when the Tokyo District Court held both the government and TEPCO accountable for the disaster, which the ruling said could have been prevented if they both took better precautionary measures, ordering both to pay 59 million yen ($414,400) in damages.
The decision comes at a time when Japan’s government tries to accelerate reactor restarts to maximize nuclear energy to meet decarbonization targets, while seeking to tone down the impact of the nuclear disaster 13 years ago, and its memory gradually fades.
Three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant melted after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami hit on March 11, 2011, releasing massive amounts of radiation in the area and displacing more than 160,000 people at one point. About 27,000 of them are still unable to return home.
The government has pushed for the decontamination of affected areas and the reopening of no-go zones, and has urged evacuees to return to their homes while cutting back support for them. The government-set compensation program, which is mostly based on distance from the plant and radiation levels, has triggered divisions and discrimination among communities.
The dispute centers on whether the government could have foreseen the risk of a massive tsunami, and whether the disaster could have been averted if the government had ordered the utility to take precautions.
In the ruling, judge Hiro Misumi said the flooding of the plant because of the tsunami wasn’t preventable even if the industry ministry used its authority and ordered the utility to enhance a seawall based on a tsunami estimate at that time.
The decision is among the four rulings that apparently came in line with the June 2022 Supreme Court decision that said the government wasn’t liable for the disaster and that the disaster from a tsunami that high wasn’t foreseeable or preventable.
Motomitsu Nakagawa, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said that Tuesday’s high court ruling was “almost a mere copy and paste” of the top court decision and that it “makes me infuriated.”
Nakagawa said the ruling takes the disaster-hit residents’ suffering lightly, and the reduction of the amount of compensation is also tantamount to saying that the operator can get away with paying only that much damage in a disaster.
He said that he planned to discuss a possible appeal to the Supreme Court after consulting with his clients.
Yuya Kamoshita, who has evacuated to Tokyo from Iwaki, south of the Fukushima Daiichi plant with his family, said the ruling was unacceptable because it trivialized the evacuees’ sufferings, and failed to hold the government accountable even though the nuclear power plant was operated as part of the national energy policy.
veryGood! (21284)
Related
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- WWE partnering with UFC, will move NXT Battleground 2024 to UFC APEX facility
- What is the best milk alternative? Here's how to pick the healthiest non-dairy option
- Denver Broncos unveil new uniforms with 'Mile High Collection'
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- An adored ostrich at a Kansas zoo has died after swallowing a staff member’s keys
- Stock market today: Asian stocks track Wall Street gains ahead of earnings reports
- 5 people found dead, including children, in Oklahoma City home, police say
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Storm relief and funding for programs related to Maine’s deadliest-ever shooting included in budget
Ranking
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Republican candidates vying for Indiana governor to take debate stage
- Tennessee’s GOP governor says Volkswagen plant workers made a mistake in union vote
- Minnesota and other Democratic-led states lead pushback on censorship. They’re banning the book ban
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Chinese generosity in lead-up to cleared doping tests reflects its growing influence on WADA
- Milwaukee man charged in dismemberment death pleads not guilty
- Islanders give up two goals in nine seconds, blow 3-0 lead in loss to Hurricanes
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Aaron Boone ejected from Yankees game after fan appears to yell something at umpire
No charges yet in weekend crash that killed 2 siblings at Michigan birthday party
Once estimated to cost $1.7 million, San Francisco's long-mocked toilet is up and running
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Beyoncé Shares Rare Look at Her Natural Hair With Wash Day Routine
Sharks do react to blood in the water. But as a CBS News producer found out, it's not how he assumed.
‘Catch-and-kill’ to be described to jurors as testimony resumes in hush money trial of Donald Trump